rchaeological science, or archaeometry, is concerned with the application of scientific techniques to historical monuments and sites, cultural artifacts and works of art. Methods range from comparatively simple techniques to sophisticated instrumentation – traditional laboratory benchwork, such as microscopy, to imaging techniques, such as Multi-Spectral Imaging (MSI) analysis and Remote-Sensing, as well as a wide variety of analytical instruments.
Different techniques are suitable for some materials and not others, and they provide data to answer specific, narrowly defined questions. For example, identification of a material may be resolved using polarized light microscopy (PLM) or energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (EDXRF), or for crystalline materials, X-ray diffraction (XRD). Determining the date of manufacture of an object or its last use (or burial) employs radiocarbon dating (C-14) for organic materials such as wood or textiles and thermoluminescence dating (TL) for ceramics. The prospective origin of marbles are determined using oxygen and carbon isotope analysis and for some gem materials, microscopy together with a suite of analytical instruments may be used, including electron microprobe.
Often, a question or problem cannot be resolved with the application of a single technique. A complicated interplay of factors may account for the state of preservation of an artifact or work of art: they may include intrinsic vice – the components used in the manufacture of the object – or external factors (e.g., burial, fire, water, application of later restoration treatments). The answer to complex questions, such as the mechanisms of deterioration or alteration effects exhibited in cultural objects/works of art – a corroded metal, or discolored pigment or clear coating that has become embrittled, opacified or yellowed with age – usually require a combination of techniques, and finding a solution to a problem may also rely on applying a multi-disciplinary approach, drawing together, for example, the expertise of conservator, scientist or physicist, archaeologist, art historian, and perhaps epigrapher, geologist, botanist or anthropologist.
Fakes, forgeries and restored objects, especially pastiche objects produced from an assemblage of old component parts, present special challenges, since duplicity or at least obfuscation of the true identity or history of an object’s life cycle is deliberate. Objects lacking provenience or provenance – associated information of archaeological context or history of ownership – likewise, make difficult inferring an accurate or complete picture of an object’s place or date of manufacture, period of use or other culturally contextualizing information. Here again, the most nearly accurate or useful information derives from a multi-disciplinary approach and the application of disparate analytical techniques.
Cite this article: L. Thoresen. March 2009 [updated 2014 August 23]. Archaeometry. www.lthoresen.com. Available at: <https://lthoresen.com/archaeometry/>.
emological study and scientific analysis of ancient gems, or archaeogemology, is a subset of archaeometry. It has not been applied routinely in the museum setting; although, gemological and analytical studies have been undertaken sporadically beginning in the 1970s and with increasing frequency since the 1990s. Most studies published to date have focused on the identification of gem materials using gemological methods and geographic provenance of the raw materials using analytical techniques.
Archaeogemology has proven useful for identifying treatment or enhancement techniques applied by ancient lapidaries and for revealing the significance of a rare gem variety, an unexpected origin, and the association of a distinctive material with a workshop or even an individual artist. Gemological and analytical studies also inform a better understanding of the gems described in ancient texts, as well as their possible origins, especially when considered in the light of updated information concerning gem deposits discovered since the mid-20th century.
As more data are gathered and published on more gems, statistical analyses may show the specific salient characteristics that reveal associations between individual gems or between gems and their geographic origins. Complete physical characterization of a gem using a suite of techniques, therefore, is as important in ancient gem studies as any single technique that might be applied to address a narrow topic or question. Analytical microscopy is the single most useful and discriminative tool for recognizing possible associations and identifying candidates for further analyses.
Gemstone provenance rarely can be determined on the basis of a single technique, but requires the determination of observable properties, such as inclusions, and quantifiable properties, such as chemistry. Specimens of unknown origin may be compared against data collected from well-characterized specimens of known origin. Data sets needed for provenance studies may be grouped into four categories:
- Chemical analysis (electron Microprobe, classical technique)
- Trace element analysis (Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry – LA-ICP-MS)
- Stable Isotopic analysis (Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry – SIMS)
- Inclusion chemistry and paragenesis (microscopy, Raman spectrometry)
In addition to the techniques listed above, other useful bulk and trace element analytical techniques for gemstone characterization include Energy-Dispersive and Wavelength X-Ray Fluorescence spectrometry (EDXRF and WDXRF); Proton Induced X-ray Emission Spectrometry (PIXE); and Synchrotron Radiation (SR).
Gemological and analytical techniques are applied to archaeological and historical gem materials selectively: the use of any given test or analysis, as well as the efficacy of using a given combination of tests or analyses is considered on a case-by-case basis for every gem specimen, whose suitability is subject to the condition and fragility of the specimen, as well as the intrusiveness of the technique.