It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
According to Dr Mark Vogelsberger of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), who led the research, the simulations back many of the current theories of cosmology. 'Many of the simulated galaxies agree very well with the galaxies in the real Universe. It tells us that the basic understanding of how the Universe works must be correct and complete,' he said.
In particular, it backs the theory that dark matter is the scaffold on which the visible Universe is hanging. "If you don't include dark matter (in the simulation) it will not look like the real Universe," Dr Vogelsberger told BBC News. Source
originally posted by: Astyanax
The model simulates universal evolution according to current cosmological theories...
originally posted by: DeadSeraph
What if we just created a universe with that very simulation?
Does it have a weight or size?
So, God and the Big Bang are pretty much the same hypothesis the main difference being the letters that spell the words.
It is true every human was created from a Big Bang. Also everyone believes in the Cosmic Big Bang, you just need to allow me to twist your words enough to realize there's not really much any difference between apples and oranges. I compare them accuratel
originally posted by: ZakOlongapo
i dont think we are the same "frequency" even we are both humans...
Yes, matter does have a frequency. It's found from Mc^2 = hf; so that f = Mc^2/h is the "fundamental frequency" where M = m/sqrt(1 - (v/c)^2) is relativistic inertia, m is rest mass (your matter), v is the speed of m, and c is light speed. h is Planck's Constant.