A random sample of 55 Canadian men aged 25 to 54 were asked to keep a daily log of the hours spent doing unpaid work around the home. The time was averaged over the week. The survey was conducted in 2000 and 2009. In 2000, the average number of hours men spent doing unpaid work around the home was 2.2, with a standard deviation of 0.6. In 2009, the average number of hours men spent doing unpaid work around the home was 2.6, with a standard deviation of 1.3. Both sample data sets appear to be normally distributed. At the 2.5% level of significance, is there evidence that the average number of hours men spent doing unpaid work around the home was higher in 2009 than in 2000?
Answer to relevant QuestionsConstruct a 95% confidence interval estimate of the increase in the amount of time that men spent doing unpaid work around the house in 2009, compared with 2000, based on the data in Exercise 8 above. In exercise A random ...Refer to your analysis for Develop Your Skills 11.2, Exercise 8 (page 420). How do the salaries of each stream of the business diploma program compare, five years after graduation? The owner of a winery is wondering whether the average purchase of visitors to her winery differs according to age. She asks the cashiers to keep track of a random sample of purchases by customers in three age groups: under ...A professor who hates being scheduled for 8 A.M. classes, or classes on Friday afternoons after 3 P.M., has decided to investigate whether student grades are affected by the time at which classes take place. She keeps track ...Use the Tukey-Kramer procedure to identify which class or classes the student who wants a high mark should avoid, and which class or classes the student should prefer. Use a 95% confidence level. Is this method of choosing ...
Post your question