Proof of Apollo Mission Photos Taken on Earth
Everyone has heard the conspiracy theory that the Apollo moon landings were hoaxed. What a ridiculous thought. I’ve seen the beautiful color photos and witnessed the Apollo missions myself as a boy in Coco Beach, Florida. I distinctly remember my father working at the Vehicle Assembly Building and all those mission patches and astronaut autographed photos he collected for me.
I remember the sound of the launch. Wow, what a sound when those Saturn Five rockets took off. When the rockets broke the sound barrier, I remember our windows to our home almost exploded. Others actually did. I remember my little sisters putting Styrofoam cups over their ears to block the sound.
Recently I have begun to ask questions regarding the still photos in my collection and videos available through NASA and the internet.
I am suspicious now. Something stinks.
Do you think the photos of the Apollo missions were really taken on the moon? Yes, you probably do. Then you should be interested in this NASA Contractor Report # 188427, The Effect of Space Radiation on Flight Film. Here is the link to NASA.
I have attached this report for your enlightenment. The author wrote the report in 1995. The report is located on the nasa.gov website. Look at the first sentence in the introduction and then read on.
This report states that film technology in 1995 still cannot prevent space radiation from exposing film producing loss of image and non-images due to exposure to cosmic and solar radiation. The moon has no atmosphere and the sun shines all the time directly on the bright side of the moon. Astronauts on the surface have absolutely no shielding from the radiation. All the moon landing film was exposed to cosmic and solar radiation during the lengthy Apollo missions and should have some over exposure issues. If the films inside the space shuttle show exposure to different degrees at different locations in the shuttle, then these moon photos should also to some degree since they have no vehicle like a shuttle to sheild the film from the radiation.
Now tell me how primitive films by 1995 standards made 20-25 years before these tests were performed in 1995 could result in clear color photos from the moon?
If you still are not convinced, watch this video.
Do you see any flaws in the quality fo the film. It’s just about as good as it gets. There is absolutely no fogging of the video what so ever, but there is one more issue. Watch the rooster tail on the moon rover. Have you ever seen a rooster tail on a vehicle at the beach? It looks very similar doesn’t it. Well, this rooster tail was performed in 1/6 of Earth’s gravity. If the particles in the rooster tail have 1/6 the force pulling them downward, they should fly about six times higher and take much longer to fall to the surface. The soil appears to fall at a rate consistent with one g. This is high school physics 101. The rover should be surrounded in a cloud of dust, even if the soil is cohesive because dust was reported as a big problem on the moon. There should be a dust cloud still behind the rover when it comes to a stop, but there is not. Watch the dirt rotate around the wheel. Does it look like it is falling to the ground 6 times slower than on Earth. No, it looks like a car stuck in the sand at the beach with one g of force acting on the soil.
I know its hard to accept the truth at times, but swallow hard, and realize we all have been mislead again. NASA could not afford to allow the truth to get out. They needed to give the public something for the billions of dollars being spent on the space race. This NASA paper also says that the new state of the art, 1995, Kevlar and lead film containers have zero effect in protecting the films, yet we all have seen the moon landing films and videos that appear unaffected.
Bottom line, Apollo films must have been exposed resulting in non-images or severely fogged images. The US did not have the technology to take photos in space during the Apollo missions and most of the films must have been shot on Earth to ensure film integrity.
Have you ever wondered about those videos of the moon walk. Here is an interesting explanation for them being filmed on Earth.
Can you explain the astronaut that falls on his face and seems to be picked up as a puppet on a string without using his hands? The other astronaut that you can hear offering to help never touches the downed astronaut. Can you explain the videos that show the reflections off the wires used to produce the effects? I’m not referring to the reflection off of the antenna on his backpack, but the other reflections above. There are many other moon videos with simliar results. Check them out if you still have doubts.
There is one more thing to consider about this video. The video shows them moving 1/2 speed. Gravity is this video appears to have an effect of 1/2 Earth gravity, not 1/6 gravity as one would expect. NASA slowed the film down to give the illusion of being filmed on the moon. Oops. NASA didn’t think we would be smart enough to figure this out. The masters of cover up didn’t quite cover their tracks as good as they thought, but it has taken about 40 years for the truth to come out.
Don’t get me wrong. I am almost confident the U.S. went to the moon, but faked the photos as a cold war bluff. The Russians must of saw the U.S. as so superior in technology at that time that they abandoned their quest for the moon and ended the cold war almost 20 years after Apollo 11 made history.
Do you believe your own eyes?
Now, YOU DECIDE!