|Reference : Gaseous emissions from weaned pigs raised on different floor systems|
|Scientific journals : Article|
|Life sciences : Animal production & animal husbandry|
Life sciences : Environmental sciences & ecology
|Gaseous emissions from weaned pigs raised on different floor systems|
|Cabaraux, Jean-François [Université de Liège - ULg > Département de productions animales > Ecologie et éthologie vétérinaires >]|
|Philippe, François-Xavier [Université de Liège - ULg > Département de productions animales > Ecologie et éthologie vétérinaires >]|
|Laitat, Martine [Université de Liège - ULg > Département clinique des animaux de production (DCP) > Département clinique des animaux de production (DCP) >]|
|Canart, Bernard [ > > ]|
|Vandenheede, Marc [Université de Liège - ULg > Département de productions animales > Ethologie vétérinaire et bien-être des animaux >]|
|Nicks, Baudouin [Université de Liège - ULg > Département de productions animales > Ecologie et éthologie vétérinaires >]|
|Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment|
|Yes (verified by ORBi)|
|[en] weaned pigs ; deep litter ; slatted floor|
|[fr] ammonia ; greenhouse gases ; water vapour|
|[en] Gaseous emissions from agriculture contribute to a number of environmental effects. Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) are greenhouse gases taking part to the global problem of climate change. Ammonia (NH3) emissions are responsible of soil acidification and eutrophication and contribute also to indirect emissions of N2O. This work evaluated the influence of the type of floor on the emissions of these gases in the raising of weaned pigs. Two trials were carried out. In the first trial, the animals were kept either on fully slatted floor or on straw-based deep litter and, in the second one, either on fully slatted floor or on sawdust-based deep litter. For each trial and on each type of floor, 2 successive batches of weaned pigs were raised without changing the litter or emptying the slurry pit between the 2 batches. The rooms were automatically ventilated to maintain a constant ambient temperature.
The performance of the animals was not significantly different according to the floor type. In trial 1, the nitrogen contents of the straw deep litter (including the substrate) and slurry were respectively 276 and 389 g pig-1. In trial 2, the sawdust deep litter and slurry nitrogen contents were respectively 122 and 318 g pig-1.
Raising pigs on straw deep litter produced proportionately around 100% more NH3 than raising pigs on slatted floor (0.61 vs. 0.31 g NH3-N d-1 per pig; P<0.05). Differences in CO2, H2O and CH4 emissions were not significant between systems. Raising pigs on sawdust deep litter produced also proportionately more NH3 (+52%; 0.55 vs. 0.36 g NH3-N d-1 per pig; P<0.01) but also more CO2 (+25%; 427 vs. 341 g d-1 per pig; P<0.001) and H2O (+65%; 981 vs. 593 g d-1 per pig; P<0.001) and less CH4 (-40%; 0.52 vs. 0.86 g d-1 per pig; P<0.001) than raising pigs on slatted floor. Practically no N2O emission was observed from rooms with slatted floor while the N2O emissions were 0.03 and 0.32 g N2O-N d-1 per pig for the straw and sawdust deep litter respectively. The warming potential of the greenhouse gases (N2O + CH4), were about 22, 34 and 168 g CO2 equivalents per day and per pig on fully slatted floor, straw or sawdust deep litter respectively.
In conclusion, pollutant gas emissions from rearing of weaned pig seem lower with fully slatted plastic floor system than with deep litter systems
|Researchers ; Professionals|
|File(s) associated to this reference|
All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.