Whilst the Ottoman market was important to Europe in the 16th century, it was no longer so by Wars had major impact on commerce especially where there were territorial losses that would rip apart Ottoman economic unity, often destroying relationships and patterns that had endured centuries.
Political Processes The Spanish and the Ottomans political processes for empire building are similar to their social processes, as it was often the government which is undeniably linked to politics enforcing certain social norms in both empires.
Cultivator families drew their livelihoods from a complex set of different economic activities and not merely from growing crops.
While both differed in their methods, their intentions were the same: Sharecropping increased utilising land that had been for animal pasturage.
McCulloch in his Dictionary of Commercebut later criticized by British politicians such as Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeliwho cited the Ottoman Empire as "an instance of the injury done by unrestrained competition" in the Corn Laws debate: The empty central Anatolian basin and steppe zone in the Syrian provinces were instances where government agencies parcelled out smallholdings of land to refugees.
Finally, increased demand for consumer goods themselves drove an increase in production to pay for the same. Therefore, the Muslim leaders created a legal code that addressed rights, duties, proper clothing, and Muslim to non-Muslim etiquette.
The development of larger ships accelerated the growth of port cities with deep harbours in order to accommodate them. However such laissez-faire policies were not always followed. It also flourished economically due to its control of the major overland trade routes between Europe and Asia.
After this Ottoman expansion, a competition started between the Portuguese Empire and the Ottoman Empire to become the dominant power in the region. The businesses and animals used previously to transport goods between regions found new work in moving goods to and from trunk lines.
The empire had managed to control nearly all former Byzantine lands surrounding the city, but in the Byzantines were temporarily relieved when the Turco-Mongol leader Timurfounder of the Timurid Empireinvaded Anatolia from the east.
With increasing affluence, their political significance grew especially in Syria. While Ottoman leadership did have to pay off rogue tribes surrounding depots, to them it was an investment, a small price to pay to protect the traders from marauders and ensure the revenue taxation brought.
Janissaries were the young boys the Ottoman leaders trained in Islamic doctrine so they could be political leaders in the future.Get an answer for 'From compare the political social and economics of empire building in the Spanish and Ottoman Empires.' and find homework help for other History questions at eNotes.
The Spanish and the Ottoman Empires can be compared and contrasted economically. One difference between the two empires was taxing in the Ottoman Empire.
Although the Ottoman Empire was tolerant of other religions, they imposed a special tax on non Muslims called the jizya.
In most cases, a multinational empires tend to be more powerful, their economy fuel with commerce which necessitate the large military present to secure various form of trade which in this case both the British and the Ottoman Empire do.
Economic history of the Ottoman Empire covers the period – The economic history falls into two distinctive sub periods. The first is the classic era (enlargement), which comprised a closed agricultural economy, showing. The Differences and Similarities of the Ottoman Empire and Early Modern Europe.
The third comparison point revolves around the economy and taxation habits of both states, looking closely at the mercantile, trade, Industrial Revolution, and taxation.
More about The Differences and Similarities of the Ottoman Empire and Early Modern. The question is not easy to answer due to both the relatively long reigns of the Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal empires.
The answer is split between the cultural and social achievements and failures of the various empires.
What are similarities and differences between the Ottoman Safavid and Mughal empires? Update Cancel. not only in.Download