Updated: May 31
Instructors, instructional designers, and educational leaders have a critical role in leading change within higher education and K-12 education. Through disruption, educators have the opportunity to reflect on their frames of reference (habits of mind and points of view) to support change and transformative learning. According to Dr. Jack Mezirow:
We have a strong tendency to reject ideas that fail to fit our preconceptions, labeling those ideas as unworthy of consideration—aberrations, nonsense, irrelevant, weird, or mistaken. When circumstances permit, transformative learners move toward a frame of reference that is more inclusive, discriminating, self-reflective, and integrative of experience” (1997, p. 5)
Therefore, change needs to begin with examining our own frame of reference. Mezirow’s 10 Phases of Transformative Learning start with Phase 1: Dilemma and conclude with Phase 10: A Reintegration (see Figure 1; Mezirow, 2000). Phase 1, in many ways, resonates with the challenges brought forth from global disruption within the educational ecosystem. A dilemma may be something new or a change that causes us to reflect on our beliefs, assumptions, feelings, or attitudes. As educators, disruptions provide an opportunity to engage in our own transformative learning and change. We can do this through discourse with others, which assists us in examining our own habitual thinking and points of view. We can reflect on (a) how we teach and (b) what we include in our courses. Do our courses align with research related to the human learning process and neuroplasticity? Do our courses integrate Universal Design for Learning and Culturally Responsive Teaching to support student success for all learners? Do our courses align with regulations or licensure? Do our courses optimize technology to engage students across all learning formats? How much is too much in terms of workload and cognitive load? These are but a few questions to move from doing what we have traditionally done to innovation and transformative learning.
10 Phases of Transformative Learning, Mezirow (2000)
As educators, it is important that we engage in transformative learning, particularly as we look at the future of education. While there is much discussion about the new normal, it is important to look at the definition of “normal.” Oxford Languages and Google (2021) define normal as “conforming to a standard; usual, typical, or expected.” Merriam-Webster (2021) defines normal as “conforming to a type, standard, or regular pattern: characterized by that which is considered usual, typical, or routine.” As we look to the future of education, there is an opportunity to break away from “typical, standard, regular, and routine” and collaboratively design learning environments in higher education and K-12 education that meet the needs of our diverse students and align with research on what we know about the brain, the human learning process, the learning sciences, and Mind, Brain, and Education Science.
In designing new courses, revising current ones, or pivoting across formats, the question to ask is: What’s in your course? Learn more about how INTERACT123 can support your work with transformative learning. Dr. Kristen Betts