The posse comitatus doctrine ("force of the
county") comes from English common law. Posse comitatus consists of the body of men
above age 15, whom the sheriff has authority to call into county service to help maintain
law and order during an emergency. The U.S. Congress passed the Posse Comitatus Act in
1878 because Congress had become concerned about the growing practice of federal marshals
in the South, and local sheriffs in the West, to press army troops into their service to
meet local emergencies without first getting approval from the president as
commander in chief. Congress goal was to preserve the strength of the U. S. Army so
it could perform its primary duty of protecting our country and its borders, something it
might not be able to do if its manpower was systematically diverted to unauthorized uses.
COMING OR ALREADY HERE?
GOD'S ANTIDOTE FOR TYRANNY
By: Tom Rose
A concerned reader who has been attentively observing
the "signs of the times" makes a thoughtful comment and poses some pertinent
It appears that our police forces in America are changing and that we are developing
into a Police State/Surveillance Society. What is the traditional model for police forces
in America? Are they in the process of being militarized? If so, for what reason? How can
we reconstruct the American concept of police?
The answer is yes. The orientation and underlying concept of police enforcement in
America have, indeed, been changing, but changing so quietly as to be hardly noticeable
except by a few careful observers. The traditional orientation of police enforcement has
been local rather than national. It was the sheriff, the highest police official in the
county, and his deputies who were unquestioningly in control of maintaining peace and
apprehending law breakers.
Incorporated cities and municipalities have the same local orientation, but the titles
change to chief of police and policemen on the beat. The general concept used to be that
law enforcement was applied by the sheriffs deputy or policeman on the beat right
where problems occurred. This historic view has changed because of political pressures and
monetary influences from the national level of government. But even now the sheriff, as
the highest-ranking police officer in the county, still has authority to tell federal
agencies and their SWAT teams (FBI, BATF, DEA, IRS, and federal marshals) how they must
conduct themselves in his county. Sadly, very few sheriffs have the intestinal fortitude
to buck the evolving national-statist system because doing so might threaten their careers
or their standing with federal agencies on whom they have become financially dependent.
Police State Defined
Before we discuss the development of the Police State in America, it is needful to
define the term. Police states are often initiated by a violent putsch: Lenins
overthrow of the Russian government in 1917, Mussolinis growing use of violence
which led to his becoming Prime Minister of Italy in 1922, and Hitlers Reichstag
fire and appointment as Prime Minister of Germany in 1933. Each of these emerging police
states focused on alleged internal and external enemies to solidify support among domestic
followers. Terror, intimidation, and propaganda were freely used. Citizens were disarmed
as quickly as possible to make them easier to control.
A Police State is characterized by centralized control over every aspect of society:
political, economic, social, cultural, and religious. This can be done through state
ownership of the means of production (socialism: France, Britain); or by being tied
politically with "communist rule of the proletariat" (Lenins and
Stalins USSR, Castros Cuba); or it can be done through a more sophisticated
form of statist control by which ownership of the means of production is left in the hands
of private entities (fascism: Mussolinis Italy; Hitlers NAZI Germany; and,
sadly, our modern USA, which has over 85 government-control agencies: the ICC, FTC, FCC,
FDA, EPA, IRS, DEA, FDIC, BATF, FEMA, IRS, Homeland Security, etc, etc).
The fascistic form of government control that developed in America got its big push by
Franklin D. Roosevelt, who was enamored with Italian fascism. During the 20th
century, regulation by federal agencies grew rapidly as each generation of American
citizens was conditioned through tax-supported education, textbook revisions, and
government/news media propaganda to embrace the freedom-destroying concept of
"government regulation to protect the people." This was able to come about
because each new generation had less understanding of the Constitution. Our founding
fathers would be aghast at the centralized government control (fascism) which now exists
in America. They thought in terms of the careful division of power to keep government from
being centralized and unlimited. Only a very few limited powers were granted to the
federal government by the states, and these were carefully delegated and enumerated.
Early Police States relied heavily on secret police squads (paid thugs) to intimidate
citizens into submission (the Soviet Union had its KGB; NAZI Germany had its brown-shirt
Gestapo; and fascist Italy had its black-shirt thugs called Facis Di Combattimento).
Those who opposed the growing Police State never knew when the door of their home might
come crashing down in the dark of night to be beaten, killed, or forcibly moved to a
In recent years in America, black-masked government SWAT teams ( also paid thugs) have
increasingly appeared on the scene (BATF, FBI, DEA, federal marshals, and joint-task
forces). Today, only the unaware feel safe.
Some very keen observers and excellent students of history regard the so-called
"terrorist attack" of 9/11, and Hurricane Katrina with its disturbing aftermath,
as likely "putsches" meant to generate chaos for justifying the imposition of
Martial Law, the disarming of Americans, and the birth of a full-blown Police State in
A frightening thought? Certainly! But take heed to a timely warning: As I carefully
watch the outworking of both 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina, I see too many signs that
Americans are being psychologically conditioned to accept a Police State! The growing use
of masked government SWAT teams is an early warning signal of the erection of a Police
State designed to rule over a frightened and compliant citizenry who have been conditioned
to value the illusory promise of "security from terrorism" more than liberty and
individual self-responsibility. The irony is that the so-called "terrorists"
against whom we are to be protected are more likely to be found within our own government
than in foreign countries!
Pressures to Federalize and Militarize Local Law Enforcement
Referring to the key role of sheriffs in law enforcement,
mentioned above, one sheriff who did have the intestinal fortitude along
with a good understanding of the U.S. Constitution to buck pressures from
Washington, D C., was Richard I. Mack who served as sheriff of Graham County, Arizona. In
January, 1994, the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) mailed all law
enforcement administrators in the country a copy of its interpretation of local law
enforcements duties regarding the "Brady Law," which required a five-day
waiting period to purchase firearms. Sheriff Mack correctly reasoned along this line:
First, the law is completely contrary to the U.S. Constitution, . . . The Brady Bill
also violates the Constitution of Arizona, which states, ". . . the rights of the
individual citizen to keep and bear arms in his own defense or in defense of the state,
shall not be impaired." . . .
Second, the Federal Government has no jurisdictional authority to order or command me
(or any other sheriff in this country) to enforce federal law. . . . I am not a
federal agent; I work for Graham County and was hired by the people of the county to do
Note that Sheriff Macks thinking concerning jurisdictional authority was
perfectly in accordance with what is known as the principle of governmental interposition.2
This is just one example of the country-wide effort to federalize local law
enforcement. Other pressures come from the vast monetary resources of various federal
agencies already mentioned. These agencies "share" money forcibly taken from
citizens (from seizures of money and property) for distribution to "bought-off"
local judges and law enforcement agencies. Thus, is justice perverted (Isaiah 59:14). It
takes a county-level official with a iron will and a very high sense of internal integrity
to resist the seductive lure of easy federal funds to buy new guns and equipment,
training, or other forms of assistance because needed funds at the local level always seem
to fall short of ever-pressing needs.
On the other hand, posse comitatus does not contrary to popular
misunderstanding prevent the President from using federal troops to quiet riots or
civil disorders. This has been done many times in the history of our country. Nor does
posse comitatus prevent the U.S. military from supporting local or state law enforcement,
as long as troops are not used to make arrests or to investigate crimes. Finally,
posse comitatus does not apply to the National Guard in its role as state
troops while on active state duty under command of the governor of the state, or to
state guards or State Defense Forces under command of the governor. (See the following
for information: 1. The Posse Comitatus
Act o f 1878; 2. The Origins of the Posse
Comitatus, by Bonnie Baker; 3. The Posse
Comitatus Act and Homeland Security, by J .R. Brinkerhoff ) Steps Toward a
Centralized Police State
At this point it is important to recap certain happenings, which
when viewed as a whole, will show the systematic erection of a police state in America. Warning:
Some parts of this will be disturbing to readers who are not aware of these "signs of
the times." That is why our Lord raises up "watchmen on the wall" (Isaiah
November, 1963: Shortly before President John F. Kennedy was murdered in Dallas,
Texas, he made certain statements, any one of which would align powerful antagonistic
forces against him:
1) He would eliminate the CIA,
2) He would issue Treasury greenbacks (which dont pay interest) in lieu of
financing government deficits through the Federal Reserve, and
3) He spoke against empowering the state of Israel with nuclear capability.
Kennedys murder served as a clear warning to future Presidents that they better
"toe the line" or suffer the same fate.
In short, JFKs assassination amounted to a coup detat, a decisive
exercise of force by which our constitutional government was subverted. Since then,
America has been controlled by a ruthless, behind-the-scenes cabal, intent on building a
New World order that is systematically destroying our constitutional government and
erecting a centralized fascist state. Since 1963, every President, regardless of political
party, has been little more than a fearful, though willing puppet of the ruling cabal.
February 28, 1993: The FBI made an armed raid on the Branch Davidian Compound, a
religious community led by David Koresh (nee Vernon Wayne Howell) near Waco, Texas, of
whom Sheriff Mack says, ". . . he was marked for death by the United States
Government as deliberately as John F. Kennedy was marked by his assassin."0
Various charges were made against Koresh, but the key point is this: The allegations of
wrong doing fell properly within the venue of local law enforcement rather than
federal. Also, it was commonly known that Koresh made visits to town almost daily, so he
could have been picked up without engaging in a military-type assassination on the
compound which housed many women and children. Videos of the final assassination show that
the federals intentionally fired machine guns at women and children every time they
attempted to escape the roaring flames consuming the compound. Why were the federals so
intent to eliminate survivors? Why did the federals preempt local police authorities to
keep out observers? Why did federal authorities dispose of the rubble so quickly? What
were they hiding?
Koreshs group became aware of drug smuggling on a deserted army landing field
next to the compound; therefore, everyone in the compound was marked for extinction. This
allegation cannot be proven because the witnesses are all dead or compromised, but it fits
in with the history of drug running by the OSS and the CIA to raise "off budget"
operating funds. For information about CIA drug running read Kiss the Boys Goodbye.4
While the CIA was inundating our country with drugs to raise "off-budget"
funds for undercover-operations overseas, Congress passed the Racketeer Influenced and
Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) in 1970. An honest application of the law should have
arrested everyone connected with CIA drug running. But, as always, such laws are only
aimed at the common people.
And judgment is turned away backward, and justice standeth afar off: for truth is
fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter (Isaiah 59:14).
In 1973, following President Nixons declaration of a "War on Drugs,"
various federal law enforcement agencies were reorganized into the Drug Enforcement Agency
(DEA). Vast sums of tax monies were then directed to smother the flames of the very drug
addiction that the CIA drug running operations were inciting! The use of federal and local
SWAT teams soared. The amount of unconstitutionally seized property also soared; and the
amount of internal police corruption resulting from the sudden inflow of captured drugs
and seized property is beyond knowing.
Forcible property seizures skyrocketed because of a new "legal twist" that
was applied to property by the courts. This innovative "legal twist" presupposes
that property itself, not the owner or user of property, is the guilty party! Therefore it
can be seized! Property even suspected of being used in relation to drugs was then
seized and sold, even if the accused parties were never brought to trial and
convicted! This is absolute totalitarianism! People with cash on their person became
immediate suspects of drug involvement and were presumed guilty unless they could prove
themselves innocent. Reports of people having their homes, autos, money, boats, and other
property seized abounded. Use of drug-sniffing dogs confronted people at airports and
other public places. Government surveillance of citizens mushroomed; their cash dealings
and bank accounts were monitored all of these are indications of an evolving Police
April 19, 1995: A home-made truck bomb exploded in front of the Alfred P. Murrah
Federal Building, allegedly killing 168 people. I use the word "allegedly"
because of a problem: The truck bomb was not powerful enough to do much more than blow out
the windows! On-the-scene witnesses testified of hearing internal explosions; it was these
bombs that imploded the building! As in the Kennedy assassination, those who insisted in
pursuing the truth met with untimely ends.
Ben Partin, a retired Air Force general who specialized in explosives, made a thorough
study and issued a detailed report showing that the building was imploded by charges
previously placed at key points "on the reinforced concrete superstructure."5
As in the Waco destruction some years earlier, the federal government invaded the proper
political venue of local law enforcement to oust local investigators, then quickly cleaned
up and disposed of the debris so a thorough and meticulous investigation could not be
done. The bloody incident which cries out to be recognized as an inside job
was used by the federal government to justify further growth of the Surveillance State.
September 11, 2001: There is no
doubt at all that the so-called "terrorist act" of 9/11 was an inside job. How
can we be so sure?
What follows is information from experienced civilian and military pilots who were
invited by Col. Donn de Grand Pré (ret. Air Force) to a meeting to discuss and evaluate
the 9/11 attack. Here are excerpts from the colonels report (portions not in quote
marks belong to de Grand Pré) entitled "The Enemy Is Inside the Gates:"0
The so-called terrorist attack was in fact a superbly executed military operation . . .
requiring the utmost professional military skill in command, communications and control.
It was flawless in timing, in the choice of selected aircraft to be used as guided
missiles, and in the coordinated delivery of those missiles to their pre-selected targets.
. . . the attack, from a psychological impact on the American public, equaled the
Japanese "surprise" attack on Pearl Harbor 7 Dec 1941.
One General officer remarked, "I seriously question whether these novices [the
alleged hijackers] could have located a target dead-on 200 miles removed from takeoff
point . . .
The extremely skillful maneuvering of the three aircraft at near mach speeds, each
unerringly hitting their targets was superb. As one Air force officer a veteran of
over 100 sorties over North Vietnam explained, "Those birds (commercial
airliners) either had a crack fighter pilot in the left seat, or they were being
maneuvered by remote control."
Another comment: "If there was an AWACS on station over the targeted area, did it
have a Global Hawk capability? I mean, could it convert the commercial jets to robotic
A hotly debated question: Who would be in command of such an Airborne Warning and
Control System (AWACS)? Chinese? Russians? Saudis? Israelis? NATO? All of these countries
possess AWACS-type aircraft. All (except the Saudis) have the capability to utilize
electro-magnetic pulsing (EMP) to knock out on-board flight controls and communications of
targeted aircraft, and then, to fly them by remote control.
Captain Kent Hill (American Airlines) said, " . . . Not one of the planes alerted
ground control that they were being hijacked." How come?
"The fact is, all the transponders were turned off on the doomed flights virtually
at the same time."
He [Hill] is convinced none of the pilots had control of their aircraft when they were
flown into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The question then becomes, who was
really in control?
" Even if I had a gun at my head, Id never fly a plane into a building . . .
and Id be searing the h___ out of them (the hijackers) by flying upside down
first," Hill said.
In fact, the pilot has the best weapon in his hand when threatened with imminent death
by a hijacker, namely, the airplane.
Another airline pilot stated: "On hearing a major scuffle in the cabin, the pilot
should have inverted the aircraft and the hijackers end up with broken necks." That
none of the four pilots executed such a maneuver points toward the fact that none of them
had control of their aircraft, but had been overridden by an outside force, which was
flying them by remote control.
As an old and not so bold pilot, I became more convinced that the four commercial jets
were choreographed by a "conductor" from a central source, namely an airborne
warning and control system (AWACS). They have the electronic capability to engage several
aircraft simultaneously, knock out their on-board flight controls by EMP (electro-magnetic
pulsing) and assume command and remote control of these targeted aircraft.
As we consider all the options and enemies . . . China, Russia, Israel, an
Islamic country, or NATO), we must also consider that the enemy may be within the gates.
If so, then we are dealing with high treason.
The above report provides overwhelming evidence that remote-controlled planes hit the
Both imploded in 8 to 10 seconds an inescapable signature of a professionally
engineered implosion from previously implanted explosives at key structural points. Rescue
workers on the scene were eye witnesses (rather, "ear witnesses) of such
explosions. Certainly, the low temperature diesel-fuel fires (smoke = insufficient oxygen,
thus low temperature) were many degrees too cool to damage the structural support of the
buildings, which were designed to withstand such collisions! Further evidence of a planned
implosion is the collapse of Building #7 at the Trade Center, which was not hit by a
plane, when the owner said, "Pull it!" Building #7 fell in the very same manner
as the Twin Towers.
What about the Pentagon? Early photos immediately after the crash of the supposed
"airliner" show a horizontal hole about 15 feet wide, much too narrow if it were
actually hit by a large airliner with a wide wingspan and heavy engines. Also, the sharp
turn this "air vehicle"reportedly made would have generated too much centrifugal
force for a live pilot to remain conscious and in control of the plane. The answer? A
Global Hawk-controlled aircraft also hit the Pentagon!8
Remember American history: It is now proven that President Franklin D. Roosevelt
intentionally sacrificed almost 3,000 U.S. servicemen as bait to entice Japan to attack
Pearl Harbor with the goal of convincing a reluctant American public to enter World War
President Lyndon Johnson also lied to the American public about the alleged
"Tonkin Bay Incident." He falsely claimed that North Vietnam had attacked two
U.S. destroyers on August 2, 1964. Result: Congress passed the Tonkin Gulf Resolution on
August 7, which got our country more deeply involved in the Vietnam War in which 58,000
Did George W. Bush have a good reason to invade Iraq? No! He first claimed Saddam
Hussein was responsible for 9/11. Later, when this was disproved, he claimed Saddam had
"weapons of mass destruction." None was ever found. He then claimed Saddam had
ties to a supposed "terrorist organization" called al Qaeda (another falsehood).
The truth is that the controlling cabal behind the Bush Administration had been planning
to attack countries in the Mid East whom the state of Israel regards as enemies
(Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Lebanon ) for a long time. The Administration,
dominated by so-called "Neocons," was looking for a plausible excuse for a
preemptive attack on Iraq. The excuse was provided by 9/11. Proof of this is perhaps best
grasped with the recent release of the "Downing Street Memo" which contains an
overview of a top secret meeting in Britain held on July 23, 2002 (months before we
attacked Iraq). Richard Dearlove (then head of British foreign intelligence, MI6) remarked
that "the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy" of removing
Saddam Hussein from power. In short, U.S. intelligence on Iraq prior to the war was
deliberately falsified to fool the public in both the U.S. and in Britain!0
Political leaders who impose totalitarianism overseas will not hesitate to impose a
centralized Police State domestically. This helps explain both the 9/11 "terrorist
attack" and what has happened in New Orleans in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.
Hurricane Katrina and New Orleans
In the chaotic aftermath of hurricane Katrina, the Pentagon declared martial law in New
Orleans, which it had no constitutional authority to do. According to many well-documented
news reports, FEMA did not allow early help and supplies into the area: Three trailer
trucks of drinking water from Wal-Mart were turned back. Jefferson Parish President, Aaron
Broussard, on Meet the Press, told how FEMA refused to allow needed diesel fuel to be
delivered by the Coast Guard. He also told how FEMA deliberately cut official
communication lines, which Sheriff Harry Lee promptly reconnected and then posted armed
deputies so the lines would not be cut again. Sheriff Jeff Hingle of Plaquemines Parish
also ordered his deputies to patrol the county line with orders not to let FEMA in.0
G. Edward Griffin, a trustworthy "watchman on the wall," has this to say
about FEMAs "apparent failure" in New Orleans:
The primary job of the military, FEMA, and Homeland Security is not to protect the
American people in times of emergency but to protect the government
. . . . Their objective was to bring the entire area under the control of the
federal government - and they succeeded in doing very well. . . .0
Because of these Police State tactics by federal agencies, Louisiana Governor Kathleen
Blanco refused to allow federal authorities to federalize National Guard units and state
and local law enforcement.0
These acts by the Louisiana sheriffs and Governor Blanco are perfect examples of
the biblical (and constitutional) principle of governmental interposition. The point to
recognize is that these protective actions by civil magistrates at the county and state
levels of jurisdiction were legitimate and necessary to preserve their
proper venues of political jurisdiction. For, in a republic (these United States of
America are a republic, not a democracy!), civil government is divided into various
levels or venues of authority which must be kept separate and independent (local,
county, state, and national) to prevent centralized tyranny.
Picking Up the Pieces
My evaluation of all these happenings, though we could go back another 30 years to
FDRs infamous coup detat, is that we have steadily been moving
toward a full-blown Police State which keeps track of every aspect of every
Americans life from birth to death as a means of centralized control. Please note
that, though this is a conclusion based on factual happenings, people can disagree
on how facts should be interpreted. Therefore, I dont expect everyone to agree with
my conclusions. But, as a "watchman on the wall" (Isaiah 62:6), I can only give
a timely warning of what I see. What, then, can we do?
For three years, my wife and I held monthly Constitutional Study Group Meetings in our
home. Patriots attended from an 80-mile radius. But, if I am right in my conclusions about
the immanency of a totalitarian Police State in America, then its much too late to
use the educational route of home meetings.
What, then, armed rebellion? This would be appropriate if Americans today were as
freedom-minded as our forefathers were during the Revolutionary War period. But, sad to
say, they are not. The vast majority of Americans today have been too firmly conditioned
mentally through tax-supported education, government propaganda, and the controlled news
media. Thus, they dont have the slightest understanding of mans God-given
freedom coupled with God-given personal responsibility. Too many Americans today are
recipients of federal monies in one form or another, so they fear to "bite the hand
that feeds them."
What is left? Prayer is always available. But God has already warned a people who
". . . rejected me, that I should not reign over them (I Samuel 8:7), that they
". . . shall cry out in that day. . . and the Lord will not hear you in that
day" (I Samuel 8:18). But, our Lord is always merciful and forgiving, so we might
well pray for deliverance and ask Him to turn the hearts of our political leaders as a
means of restoring freedom (Psalm 72:1; Proverbs 8:15; I Timothy 2:1-2; Psalm 143:8-9).
Another form of prayer is imprecatory prayer through which believers call upon God to
pour out His wrath on evil rulers and doers of iniquity. Many Christians are unaware of
the sheer number of imprecatory prayers in the Bible (Psalms 10:15; 55;9-11, 15-16;
58;3-8, 10-11; 68:1-2; 69:22-28; 83:11-18; 109:7-31). Now is a time to use Gods
model for such prayers in asking Gods deliverance from growing tyranny.
Lastly, this brings us to Gods biblical method of deposing tyrants through
intermediate civil magistrates whom God raises up to save His people by interposing
themselves between the offending tyrant(s) and the oppressed people. But, first, we must
repent from the sins for which He might be bringing the curse of governmental tyranny upon
us. There is no doubt that we as a people have strayed far from applying the biblical
principles of righteousness to every aspect of our life: personal, family, church, civil
government, as well as economic pursuit. Can we expect Gods favor if we dont
first turn to Him in repentance?
I referred to the biblical and historical principle of governmental interposition
earlier in this essay. The first published article that I wrote on this timely and much
needed principle was entitled "On Reconstruction and the American Republic" in
Thankfully, there are many individuals throughout America who qualify as an
"intermediate magistrate." Every elected officeholder or political bureaucrat
who has taken the oath of office and has sworn to protect the Constitution against all
enemies, both foreign and domestic is, in fact, an intermediate magistrate from both a
biblical and constitutional viewpoint. This, by the way, includes every person who is
serving, or has served, in the military. Let us pray that God will raise up leaders to
serve as intermediate magistrates, and citizens to rally behind them, to return America to
constitutional government. Freedom and self-responsibility will then be restored. This is
truly Gods revealed plan for restoring godly law and order to our troubled country!
1.Richard I. Mack and Timothy Robert Walters, From My Cold Dead Fingers
(Safford, Arizona: Rawhide Western Publishing, 1996), 15-16.
2.Tom Rose, Reclaiming the American Dream by Reconstructing the American Republic
(Mercer, Pennsylvania: American Enterprise Publications, 1996).
4.Monika Jensen-Stevenson and William Stevenson, Kiss the Boys Goodbye: How the
United States Betrayed Its Own POWs in Vietnam (New York: Dutton, 1990).
5.The Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee, Final Report on the Bombing of the
Alfred P. Murrah Building, April 19, 1995 (Oklahoma City, Oklahoma: Oklahoma Bombing
Investigation Committee, 2001), 183.
7.Sources of Videorecordings: 9/11:The Great Illusion: End Game Of The Illuminati,
Our Choice: Fear Or Love? produced by George Humphrey, Common Sense, P.O. Box 5772,
Austin, TX, 78763. www.fearorlove.com. Confronting
The Evidence: A Call to Reopen The 9/11 Investigation produced by Jimmy Walter and
ReOpen 911 Org., P.O. Box 3871, Santa Barbara, CA, 93130. www.reopen911.org. 911 In Plane Site: The
Directors Cut produced by The Power Hour, P.O. Box 85, Versailles, MO, 65084. www.ThePowerHour.com. Painful Deceptions
produced by Eric Hufschmid. www.erichufschmid.net.
8.Robert B. Stinnett, Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor (New
York: The Free Press, 2000).
0.9."Downing Street memo," The Sunday Times, 1 May 2005.
0.11.G. Edward Griffin, The US Government Did Not Fail Its Mission In The Wake of
Hurrican Katrina, 2005 September 16, www.freedom-force.org.
12.make me free, CNN confirms Bush/Blanco fight, Sep 5th, 2005, www.dailykos.com/story/2005/9/5/94728/87063.
13.Tom Rose, "On Reconstruction And The American Republic," The Journal of
Christian Reconstruction (Summer, 1978): 14.
originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink
Tom Rose is retired professor of Economics at Grove City
College, PA. He is author of eight books and hundreds of articles on free-market
economics. He is a regular columnist for Ether Zone.
We invite you to visit his website at: www.biblicaleconomics.com.
Published in the October 17, 2005 issue of Ether Zone.
Copyright © 1997 - 2005 Ether
We invite your
comments on this article in our forum!