Many people are hesitant to take Nanosil 10 nanosilver, and that is understandable. They haven’t heard of it before, and neither have their doctors, who often advise not to take it, even though they know nothing about it. And oncologists will often discourage people with cancer from taking it, because they don’t want it to interfere with the chemo they are administering.
Also, Precious Waters brand Nanosil 10 is FDA approved only for use as a dietary supplement, so claims cannot be made that it is effective against cancer, malaria, HIV and other diseases.
On the other hand, in 2006 Ron W. Leavitt, PhD, Professor of Microbiology and Molecular Biology at Brigham Young University, conducted extensive tests of Nanosilver 10. He confirmed a number of things.
He confirmed that the particle size in Nanosilver 10 was within certain specified ranges, but more important, he sent letters about its effectiveness against viruses, bacteria and fungi, as well as the fact that it is non-toxic. The nanosilver killed all harmful viruses and bacteria it was tested on. Also, it was proven to be non-toxic to animals even in quantities that would be far greater than a human would ever ingest. Nanosil 10 was also shown to be far more effective than any other type or brand of nanosilver tested.
In addition to this scientific input, you can also take into consideration the hundreds of anecdotes about people who have taken Nanosil 10 and recovered from diseases and illnesses that range from cancer and malaria to endometriosis, HIV, and several other diseases caused by either a virus, bacteria or fungus. Only a small fraction of these anecdotes are on this blog.
You can also take into consideration an article in the journal Molecules published in 2011 summarizing the effectiveness of nanosilver against many viruses and bacteria. Harry can send you a link to that article as well, and it contains glowing comments about the effectiveness of nanosilver in killing viruses and bacteria, but there is one problem with it.
At the bottom of page 8903 it states that “silver nanoparticles have to be regarded as potentially harmful, especially when intended for treating a respiratory disease …” This is not correct for Nanosil 10, as the BYU tests in 2006 demonstrated. Obviously the authors were not aware of these tests and their results.
You can also take into consideration the fact that Nanosil nonionic and not colloidal, is converted by the body into ionic form only after ingestion, and therefore does not result in silver chloride or other unwanted salts precipitating out. It is also non-toxic
When deciding whether to take Nanosil 10, you can also take into account the fact that over half a dozen doctors around the country order it from Harry, and one of them wants to order in quantities large enough so that he can private-label it for his patients.
You might also take into account the results of carefully monitored and certified clinical trials conducted in Kenya during the past two years, one of which was partially sponsored by The Gates Foundation, and another which was sponsored by the government of Kenya. The treatment consisted of Nanosilver 10, the only nanosilver brand allowed to be imported into Kenya, and three drugs, administered by doctors.
Over 400 people were in each trial, and they had diseases that included, HIV, TB and cancer. The results were so positive, with more than 80% recovery or substantial improvement, that the government passed an initial authorization to spend over $2 billion to make the treatment that includes Nanosil 10 available for over one million people.
Each person will make up their own minds as to whether they will use Nanosil 10. That is as it should be. The problem Harry has encountered over the years, however, is that some people will immediately go to the internet and come across some negative information about possible toxicity of nanosilver that is totally irrelevant to Nanosil 10, and has been totally disproven by the tests at BYU. There is suspicion that such articles were secretly sponsored by some pharmaceutical firms fearful about their profits if something so inexpensive as nanosilver were to be proven effective in place of their expensive antibiotics, but that is not known.
Also, many people will go to their doctors, who are not aware of nanosilver and will reject it out of hand, knowing nothing about it. This is not a problem in those instances where people recover from their illness anyway, without using Nanosil 10, but it is heartbreaking to learn of people who died after conventional treatment, when they suffered from roughly the same condition that others recovered from after taking Nanosil 10. As noted, no cause and effect relationship can be claimed, but it is still sad to hear of these cases nevertheless.
So as you look into it, do indeed take into account input from medical professionals you trust, but also determine how much they know about Nanosil 10, and please do consider all the input mentioned here.