Insecticide resistance in Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) from villages in central, northern and south west Ethiopia and detection of kdr mutation
© Balkew et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 29 January 2010
Accepted: 25 April 2010
Published: 25 April 2010
Anopheles arabiensis is the major vector of malaria in Ethiopia. Malaria vector control in Ethiopia is based on selective indoor residual spraying using DDT, distribution of long lasting insecticide treated nets and environmental management of larval breeding habitats. DDT and pyrethroid insecticides are neurotoxins and have a similar mode of action on the sodium ion channel of insects. It was therefore necessary to verify the insecticide susceptibility status of An. arabiensis, to better understand the status of cross-resistance between DDT and the pyrethroids in this species as well as to detect a resistant gene.
Standard WHO insecticide susceptibility tests were conducted on adults reared from larval and pupal collections from breeding sites at three villages namely: Sodere in the Rift Valley, Gorgora in the north and Ghibe River Valley in the south west of Ethiopia. The occurrence of cross-resistance between pyrethroids and DDT was determined using a DDT selected laboratory colony originally collected from Gorgora. Phenotypically characterized mosquitoes were tested for the presence of knockdown resistance (kdr) alleles using the standard polymerase chain reaction assay.
All An. gambiae s.l. specimens assayed by PCR were identified as An. arabiensis. The knockdown and mortality results showed An. arabiensis resistance to DDT in all villages, resistance to deltamethrin and permethrin in the Ghibe River Valley and permethrin resistance in Gorgora. Bioassay susceptibility tests also indicated the presence of cross-resistance between DDT and permethrin, but not between DDT and deltamethrin. The knockdown resistance (kdr) mutation of leucine to phenylalanine in the sodium ion channel gene was detected in populations from Gorgora and the Ghibe River Valley.
Since An. arabiensis shows high levels of resistance to DDT in all villages tested and varying pyrethroid resistance in Gorgora and the Ghibe River valley, precautionary measures should be taken in future vector control operations. Moreover, the status of resistance in other locations in Ethiopia and the spread of resistant gene (s) should be investigated.
Malaria vector control in Ethiopia is targeted mainly against Anopheles arabiensis as this species is responsible for transmitting Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax . Vector control measures including selective indoor residual spraying of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), distribution of long lasting insecticide treated mosquito nets (LLINs) and source reduction of larval habitats are currently implemented by the Federal Ministry of Health in collaboration with international and non-governmental organizations. The history of utilization of DDT in the country dates back to the mid 1950s with small scale trials followed by wide and extensive application during the malaria eradication period. Thus, DDT has been in use for more than four decades. The emergence of DDT resistance in An. arabiensis has been reported from different localities in Ethiopia [2, 3] and the highest levels of resistance were recorded from ArbaMinch in the South and Gambella in the West . DDT resistance has also been demonstrated in populations of An. pharoensis in two localities [4, 5], one of three secondary malaria vectors of Ethiopia (the other two being An. funestus and An. nili).
DDT and pyrethroid insecticides are insect neurotoxins that interfere with ion flow regulation across the sodium ion channels. Ion channel modification via an amino-acid substitution leads to reduced target site sensitivity known as knockdown resistance (kdr). The substitution of leucine at position 1014 for either a phenylalanine or a serine has been reported in An. gambiae s.s. from West and East Africa, respectively [6, 7]. These mutations have also been reported in An. arabiensis [8, 9].
In view of the prolonged utilization of DDT for vector control, the application of different agricultural pesticides in agrodevelopment areas and the planned up-scaling of pyrethroid treated LLINs distributionace in the areasurrounding areas is found in Metehara. ArbaMinch is Metehara is one of the, it was necessary to evaluate the insecticide susceptibility status and genetic basis of insecticide resistance and cross-resistance in An. arabiensis from three selected localities in Ethiopia.
The study was conducted at three localities namely Ghibe River Valley in the west (hereafter referred to as Ghibe), Sodere hot springs in the Rift Valley and Gorgora in the North West where DDT spraying has been practiced for a long time. Ghibe (8°14'N, 37°35'E, altitude 1,040-1,080 m) is situated 185 kms south-west of Addis Ababa. It has a long history of state owned farming in which vegetables, maize and citrus fruits are produced. The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) used to conduct research studies on cattle trypanosomiasis and Glossina in the same locality as well as in Tolay (Upper Ghibe River Valley). To control tsetse flies, the ILRI introduced deltamethrin (pyrethroid) treated cattle as well as targets impregnated with the same insecticide . Currently, the Institute provides technical support to local farmers at both study sites for the application of cyfluthrin (pyrethroid) on cattle (Dr. Woudyalew Mulat, personal communication). Sodere hot springs (8° 24'N and 39° 23'E, altitude 1,360 m) is located in the middle course of the Rift Valley about 125 kms east of Addis Ababa. Gorgora (12° 12'N and 37° 16' E, altitude 1,800 m) is located at the northern tip of Lake Tana, about 800 kms north of Addis Ababa. Three private agricultural developments are underway near Gorgora.
Insecticide susceptibility tests
Insecticide susceptibility tests were carried out at different times between November 2005 and April 2007. Mosquito larvae and pupae were collected from various breeding sites and reared to adults. Two to three days old, non blood fed adult females morphologically identified as An. gambiae s. l were exposed to discriminating dosages of 4% DDT, 0.05% deltamethrin and 0.75% permethrin using WHO papers (obtained from Vector Control Research Unit, School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia) and bioassay tubes for 1 hour . Number of mosquitoes knocked down during exposure was recorded at intervals of 5 minutes and the proportions of survivors and dead mosquitoes were recorded 24 hours post exposure. The same number of mosquitoes was exposed to insecticide free papers as controls.
Samples of dead and surviving mosquitoes were preserved in 95% ethanol and kept in a freezer (-21°C) for subsequent molecular species identification and kdr analysis. The quality of impregnated papers was checked on a laboratory colony of An. arabiensis which is susceptible (100% mortality) to DDT, permethrin and deltamethrin. The colony is maintained at the Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University, since September 2001 from original collection of mosquitoes from Debrezeit, 45 kilometers east of Addis Ababa.
A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was carried out to differentiate An. arabiensis from its An. gambiae complex sibling species according to the method of Scott et al. .
Knockdown resistance gene detection
For detection of kdr mutations, genomic DNA was isolated from 70 mosquitoes according to the method of Collins et al. . Two separate PCR reactions were run, one to detect alleles of the leucine-phenylalanine substitution, the other, to detect wild-type susceptible alleles following the methods described in Matambo et al.  and Abdalla et al. . The occurrence of kdr was confirmed by direct sequencing of the 293 base pair fragment of the sodium channel gene amplified using Agd1 and Agd2 primers . Amplicons were submitted to Inqaba Biotec Company, Pretoria, South Africa for sequencing in both directions.
Selection for resistance, colony maintenance and cross resistance evaluation
An. arabiensis strain originating from a collection of wild females from Gorgora was selected for resistance to DDT. Selections were carried out in the insectary at the Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology by exposing male and female adults over generation to 4% DDT impregnated papers. Full resistance to DDT (zero mortality) was achieved in the 6th generation. Subsequently insecticide susceptibility tests using 0.75% permethrin and 0.5% deltamethrin impregnated papers were carried out on the 8th generation according to the standard WHO method . Tests included 5 replicates of 20 unfed, 2-3 day old adult females per replicate. Controls included exposure of females from the same cohort to insecticide free papers.
Percentage mortalities 24 h post exposure was used to assess the status of susceptibility/resistance to insecticides. The KT50 and KT90 (time to knockdown 50% and 90% mosquitoes, respectively) values were calculated for each insecticide using probit analysis in SPSS 15.0 for windows. Fisher's exact test was applied to observe associations between genotypes and phenotypes. Chi-square statistics was used to analyze allelic and genotype frequencies.
Mosquito species identification
300 An. gambiae s.l. samples were assayed by PCR. All were identified as An. arabiensis.
Insecticide susceptibility test results
Mortality and knockdown effect of insecticides on An. arabiensis from three localities in Ethiopia.
KT50in minutes (95% confidence interval)
KT90in minutes (95% confidence interval)
kdr gene detection
Genotypic frequency of kdr from bioassayed An. arabiensis from Gorgora and Ghibe, Ethiopia
Comparison of genotype determination between PCR and sequencing of Sodium channel gene of An. arabiensis from Gorgora and Ghibe River Valley, Ethiopia.
Same as PCR
The occurrence of kdr mutations were further confirmed by sequencing the 293 base-pair fragment of the sodium channel gene of 14 randomly chosen An. arabiensis from Gorgora and Ghibe. The sequences revealed similar results (with only one exception from Ghibe) with that of PCR confirming the presence of 1014F kdr gene (Table 3).
Bioassay test results of base and DDT selected F8 An. arabiensis from Gorgora.
% mortality in base
KT50(minutes) in base
The insecticide susceptibility data indicate high levels of resistance to DDT in An. arabiensis at all localities, although varying level of mortality and knockdown were observed. The highest level of resistance as shown by the survival rates to DDT was recorded in Ghibe (96%) followed by Gorgora (50.5%) and Sodere (21.2%). Resistance to DDT is higher than previously reported in An. arabiensis from Gambela (76%) in the West and ArbaMinch (60%) in the South . The results obtained from Gorgora are comparable to those of the eastern localities (Metehara and MelkaWorer) where 45-50% resistance was reported . Ameneshewa  noted 30% resistance from Gergedi which is close to Sodere.
Anopheles arabiensis from Ghibe shows high resistance (about 70%) to permethrin and deltamethrin as well. The Gorgora population also shows signs of resistance to pyrethroids (15%-20%) based on final mortality data. The time to 50% knockdown at Gorgora was higher (KT50 = 19.6 minutes for permethrin and 25.3 minutes for deltamethrin) than that of a susceptible laboratory colony (KT50s of 14.6 and 18.3 minutes for permethrin and deltamethrin, respectively: data not shown) as well as of a susceptible reference strain of An. gambiae [17, 18]. The pyrethroid resistance levels in Gorgora at the present are unlikely to pose an epidemiological threat but routine periodic monitoring to determine levels of resistance are needed. Anopheles arabiensis from Sodere are susceptible to the two pyrethroids and yet, their knockdown times are similar to those recorded in Gorgora. In neighboring Sudan, An. arabiensis showed comparable levels of resistance to permethrin (final mortalities varying between 10-55% in Gezira and 6-22% in Sennar) . However, populations of this species proved susceptible to pyrethroids at three localities in the eastern part of the country . Variable levels of resistance to DDT and pyrethroids in An. arabiensis populations in neighboring countries raises concerns because of unrestricted gene flow between populations through migration.
The West African kdr mutation was detected in An. arabiensis from Ghibe and Gorgora. Resistance to pyrethroids and DDT in An. gambiae associates closely with kdr [6, 7, 19, 20]. However, a similar correlation of kdr with the phenotypic expression of resistance could neither be established in a DDT-selected An. arabiensis laboratory strain from Sudan  nor in natural populations [9, 15]. Matambo et al.  and Abdalla et al.  observed discrepancies in their PCR data compared to sequenced samples. The findings from Sudan samples also showed that kdr is found in phenotypically insecticide susceptible mosquitoes, not being restricted to resistant individuals alone. The data from Gorgora and Ghibe show the same phenomenon whereby kdr homozygotes were recorded in samples characterized as phenotypically susceptible to insecticides. Brooke  argues that kdr might not be the only mechanism that confers resistance to DDT and pyrethroids and suggests the potential involvement of enzyme detoxification. Target site insensitivity coupled with enzyme detoxification has been described in An. gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus from Benin .
The insecticide resistance in An. arabiensis from Ghibe and Gorgora and reduced level from Sodere may be attributable to differential insecticide selection pressure. Applications of insecticide against agricultural pests and disease vectors including anophelines and tsetse flies are practiced intensively in Ghibe and, to a lesser extent, in Gorgora. Documented information is lacking on the types of insecticides in use at these agricultural localities except that deltamethrin and cyflumethrin pour-ons are used on cattle in Ghibe . In Gorgora, different types of insecticides have been in use for a number of years to control agricultural pests (Ato Teklu, personal communication), although it was difficult to establish whether DDT has been used. Use of agricultural pesticides in Ghibe may account for the increased resistance of An. arabiensis to deltamethrin and permethrin. Pyrethroids have not been used for malaria vector control in these areas until the recent distribution of LLINs which started in 2005. Agricultural pesticides may exert selective pressure on malaria vectors by leaching into breeding habitats so that the immature stages are continuously exposed. In West Africa, DDT application on farms during the early WHO malaria vector control era and extensive use of pyrethroids on cotton farms has been attributed to increased resistance of An. gambiae to pyrethroids as well as increased frequency of the kdr genotype in many countries [20, 22, 23]. In urban areas, insecticides for households and the expansion of urban agriculture are suggested to cause resistance in malaria vectors in West Africa .
Cross-resistance between DDT and permethrin was shown in a DDT-resistant laboratory colony of An. arabiensis originating from Gorgora possibly caused by kdr. By contrast, cross resistance between DDT and deltamethrin was not recorded in An. arabiensis samples from Sudan . In this case the influence of kdr might be less important because the test population carrying the kdr allele showed a high level of susceptibility to deltamethrin, suggesting the existence of an independent DDT resistance mechanism. The absence of cross-resistance between DDT and deltamethrin in Gorgora DDT-selected An. arabiensis is encouraging in terms of LLINs utilization, although the moderate deltamethrin resistance recorded requires careful monitoring and consideration.
The potential impact of resistance on LNs use and indoor spraying with DDT in Ghibe is unknown and needs to be established. Permethrin resistance in An. arabiensis from Sodere is lower than in Ghibe, and regular monitoring should identify any changes in the level of resistance in association with the continued use of LLINs. In Kenya, lower susceptibility of An. gambiae to permethrin was indicated in villages where permethrin impregnated mosquito nets were implemented as compared to villages without nets in a period of one year and the reduction was linked to increased detoxification caused by elevated cytochrome P450 monooxygenase activity together with kdr-w. Similarly, another study by Stump et al.  confirmed an increased frequency of kdr in villages with nets.
In conclusion, since the country relies on DDT for indoor residual sprays, the development of resistant populations of An. arabiensis implies careful consideration and monitoring of ongoing vector control program. There is also a need to monitor pyrethroid susceptibility in wider areas covering a number of vector populations.
The technical assistance of staff of ALIPB, IEND and VCRU is greatly acknowledged.
This study obtained financial assistance from the MIM/TDR research project (ID No. TDA 40048A) which aimed to study the epidemiology of malaria in Ethiopia and Sudan and was carried out by AHRI, IEND and ALIPB. AHRI is also acknowledged for facilitating field work and some international travel expenses.
- Gebreyesus AT, Deressa W, Witten HK, Getachew A, Seboxa T: Malaria. Epidemiology and Ecology of Health and Disease in Ethiopia. Edited by: Berhane Y, Haile Mariam D, Kloos H. 2006, Shama Books. Addis AbabaGoogle Scholar
- Abose T, Yeebiyo Y, Olana D, Alamirew D, Beyene YA, Regassa L, Mengesha A: Re-orientation and Definition of the Role of Malaria Vector Control in Ethiopia: The Epidemiology and Control of Malaria with Special Emphasis on the Distribution, Behaviour and Susceptibility of Insecticides of Anopheline Vectors and Chloroquine Resistance in Zwai, Central Ethiopia and Other Areas. 1998, World Health Organization WHO/Mal/1998.1085Google Scholar
- Balkew M, Gebre-Michael T, Hailu A: Insecticide susceptibility of Anopheles arabiensis in two agrodevelopment localities in eastern Ethiopia. Parasssitologia. 2003, 45: 1-3.Google Scholar
- Wezam A, Seulu F: Anopheles pharoensis susceptibility status to DDT and malathion in Zwai area, south-central Ethiopia. Ethiop Pharm J. 1994, 12: 45-50.Google Scholar
- Balkew M, Elhassen I, Ibrahim M, Gebre-Michael T, Engers H: Very high DDT-resistant population of Anopheles pharoensis Theobald (Diptera: Culicidae) from Gorgora, Northern Ethiopia. Parasite. 2006, 13: 327-329.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinez-Torres D, Chandre F, Williamson MS, Darriet F, Berge JB, Devonshire AL, Guillet P, Pasteur N, Pauron D: Molecular characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 1998, 7: 179-184. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.1998.72062.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ranson H, Jansen B, Vulule JM, Wang X, Hemingway J, Collins FH: Identification of a point mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Kenyan Anopheles gambiae associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroids. Insect Mol Biol. 2000, 9: 491-497. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00209.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verhaeghen K, Van Bortel W, Roelants P, Backeljau T, Coosemans M: Detection of the East and West African kdr mutation in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis from Uganda using a new assay based on FRET/Melt Curve analysis. Malaria J. 2006, 5: 16-10.1186/1475-2875-5-16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Himeidan YE, Dukeen MY, El-Rayah el A, Adam I: Anopheles arabiensis: abundance and insecticide resistance in an irrigated area of eastern Sudan. East Med Hlth J. 2004, 10: 167-74.Google Scholar
- Rowlands GJ, Leak SG, Mulatu W, Nagda SM, Wilson A, d'Ieteren GD: Use of deltamethrin 'pour-on' insecticide for the control of cattle trypanosomosis in the presence of high tsetse invasion. Med Vet Entomol. 2001, 15: 87-96. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2001.00272.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- WHO: Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vectors, bio-efficacy and persistence of insecticides on treated surfaces. 1998, World Health Organization WHO/CDS/MAL/98.12Google Scholar
- Scott JA, Brogdon WG, Collins FH: Identification of single specimens of the Anopheles gambiae complex by the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993, 49: 520-529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Collins FH, Mendez MA, Rasmussen MO, Mehaffey PC, Besansky NJ, Finnerty V: A ribosomal RNA gene probe differentiates member species of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1987, 37: 37-41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matambo TS, Abdalla H, Brooke BD, Koekemoer LL, Mnzava A, Hunt RH, Coetzee M: Insecticide resistance in the malarial mosquito Anopheles arabiensis and association with the kdr mutation. Med Vet Entomol. 2007, 21: 97-102. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2007.00671.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abdalla H, Matambo TS, Koekemoer LL, Mnzava AP, Hunt RH, Coetzee M: Insecticide susceptibility and vector status of natural populations of Anopheles arabiensis from Sudan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008, 102: 263-71. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.10.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ameneshewa B: The behaviour and biology of Anopheles arabiensis in relation to the epidemiology and control of malaria in Ethiopia. PhD thesis. 1995, University of LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
- Chandre F, Darriet F, Duchon S, Finot L, Manguin S, Carnevale P, Guillet P: Modifications of pyrethroid effects associated with kdr mutation in Anopheles gambiae. Med Vet Entomol. 2000, 14: 81-8. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2000.00212.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Etang J, Manga L, Chandre F, Guillet P, Fondjo E, Mimpfoundi R, Toto JC, Fontenille D: Insecticide susceptibility status of Anopheles gambiae s.l (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Republic of Cameroon. J Med Entomol. 2003, 40: 491-7. 10.1603/0022-2585-40.4.491.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chandre F, Darrier F, Manga L, Akogbeto M, Faye O, Mouchet J, Guillet P: Status of pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles gambiae sensu lato. Bull World Health Organ. 1999, 77: 230-234.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diabaté A, Brengues C, Baldet T, Dabire KR, Hougard JM, Akogbeto M, Kengne P, Simard F, Guillet P, Hemingway J, Chandre F: The spread of the Leu-Phe kdr mutation through Anopheles gambiae complex in Burkina Faso: genetic introgression and de novo phenomena. Trop Med Int Hlth. 2004, 9: 1267-1273. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01336.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brooke BD: kdr : can a single mutation produce an entire insecticide resistance phenotype?. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008, 102: 524-5. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.01.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Corbel V, N'Guessan R, Brengues C, Chandre F, Djogbenou L, Martin T, Akogbeto M, Hougard JM, Rowland M: Multiple insecticide resistance mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae. and Culex quinquefasciatus from Benin, West Africa. Acta Tropica. 2007, 101: 207-16. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.01.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Müller P, Chouaibou M, Pignatelli P, Etang J, Walker ED, Donnelly MJ, Simard F, Ranson H: Pyrethroid tolerance is associated with elevated expression of antioxidants and agricultural practice in Anopheles arabiensis sampled from an area of cotton fields in Northern Cameroon. Mol Ecol. 2008, 17: 1145-55. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03617.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elissa N, Mouchet J, Riviere F, Meunier JY, Yao K: Resistance of Anopheles gambiae s.s to pyrethroids in Cote d'Ivoire. Ann Soc Belge Med Trop. 1993, 73: 291-4.Google Scholar
- Vulule JM, Beach RF, Atieli FK, McAllister JC, Brogdon WG, Roberts JM, Mwangi RW, Hawley WA: Elevated oxidase and esterase levels associated with permethrin tolerance in Anopheles gambiae from Kenyan villages using permethrin-impregnated nets. Med Vet Entomol. 1999, 13: 239-44. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.1999.00177.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stump AD, Atieli FK, Vulule JM, Besansky NJ: Dynamics of the pyrethroid knockdown resistance allele in western Kenyan populations of Anopheles gambiae in response to insecticide-treated bed net trials. Am J Tropl Med Hyg. 2004, 70: 591-6.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.