David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (3):pp. 464-466 (2009)
he history of evolutionary theory is a little bit of a puzzle. Charles Darwin, the author of the Origin of Species in 1859, was the man who made evolutionary ideas reasonable—ideas that were generally accepted—and it was Darwin who provided the major mechanism of natural selection. He was not the first evolutionist, however. For at least one hundred and fifty years, starting with people like the French encyclopediast Denis Diderot, people had been speculating that organisms had a natural origin, from primitive forms. But why did these speculations have to wait this long? It is true that Christianity, incorporating as it did the creation stories of Genesis—what the nineteenth-century English essayist Thomas Carlyle called "Jewish old clothes"—was not going to be friendly towards evolution. But what about the Greeks? Did not they get into such ideas?As a matter of fact we all know that they did, a bit. Empedocles had some fanciful ideas about pieces coming together to make functioning organisms, but these were ideas for which he was roundly scolded by Aristotle. Why? Ernst Mayr, the distinguished, twentieth-century evolutionist, used to argue that Plato was the culprit. Supposedly, the theory of forms precluded any sort of developmentalism. Jellyfish are jellyfish and cows are cows and humans are humans, and that is an end to it. But many have long suspected that Mayr is probably not
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael J. Reiss (2011). How Should Creationism and Intelligent Design Be Dealt with in the Classroom? Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):399-415.
Stuart Brock (2010). The Creationist Fiction: The Case Against Creationism About Fictional Characters. Philosophical Review 119 (3):337-364.
George Nakhnikian (2004). It Ain't Necessarily So: An Essay Review of Intelligent Design Creationism and its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives. Philosophy of Science 71 (4):593-604.
Jeffrey Goodman (2004). A Defense of Creationism in Fiction. Grazer Philosophische Studien 67 (1):131-155.
D. N. Sedley (2008). Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. University of California Press.
Gordon Campbell (2009). Philosophy (D.N.) Sedley Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. (Sather Classical Lectures 66). Berkeley and London: University of California Press, 2007. Pp. Xvii + 269. $29.95/£17.95. 9780520253643. [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 129:227-.
Robin Waterfield (2011). Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. By David Sedley. Heythrop Journal 52 (2):310-311.
Daniel W. Graham (2009). Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. Ancient Philosophy 29 (2):423-427.
Andrew Gregory (2010). Creationism (D.) Sedley Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. (Sather Classical Lectures 66.) Pp. Xviii + 269. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 2007. Cased, £17.95, US$29.95. ISBN: 978-0-520-25364-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 60 (02):364-366.
Added to index2009-07-22
Total downloads27 ( #176,451 of 1,941,049 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #334,047 of 1,941,049 )
How can I increase my downloads?