“Trump administration finalizes replacement for Obama’s Clean Power Plan” – Ars Technica
Rule regulates emissions at the power-plant level versus at the state level.
- Eventually, the Supreme Court stayed the rule, so it was never actually implemented.
- Now, the ACE rule requires states to set federal emissions limits by individual power plant.
- The rule also makes it easier for power plants to make efficiency upgrades without triggering additional repairs.
- When the EPA proposed the ACE rule last year, it was also required to submit an analysis of how the change from the CPP to the ACE would affect US citizens.
- While the ACE rule would result in an absolute reduction of a variety of emissions compared to nothing, the EPA’s own analysis admitted that an estimated 1,400 additional deaths would occur every year under the ACE rule compared to implementing the CPP.
- In a press release today, the EPA said that states would have three years to propose pathways to complying with the ACE rule.
- Still, it’s not fully apparent that the ACE rule will be the bailout the coal industry is looking for.
- In October, Reuters published a survey of 44 US utilities that had announced a coal power-plant shutdown, and none of the surveyed utilities said that the ACE rule would change its decision to retire the coal plants in question.
Reduced by 59%
Author: Megan Geuss