Quantifying patterns of population structure in Africans and African Americans illuminates the history of human populations and is critical for undertaking medical genomic studies on a global scale. the X chromosome showed elevated levels of African ancestry, consistent with a sex-biased pattern of gene flow with an excess of European male and African female ancestry. We also find that genomic profiles of individual African Americans afford personalized 60643-86-9 ancestry reconstructions differentiating ancient vs. recent European and African ancestry. Finally, patterns of genetic similarity among inferred African segments of African-American genomes and genomes of contemporary African populations included in this study suggest African ancestry is most similar to non-Bantu Niger-Kordofanian-speaking populations, consistent with historical documents of the African Diaspora and trans-Atlantic slave trade. (29)] was low (1.2%), suggesting quite recent common ancestry of all individuals in our sample or, alternatively, a large effective population size for the structured population from which the sample was drawn, with a large degree of gene flow among subpopulations. Nonetheless, we observed substantial variation in pairwise among sampled populations, suggesting genetic heterogeneity among the groups (Table 1). Differences in pairwise may reflect variation in effective population size or migration rates among the populations potentially attributable to isolation by distance or heterogeneity in geographical or cultural barriers to gene flow. For example, the Fulani appear to be genetically distinct from all other West African populations we sampled (average pairwise = 3.91%). Likewise, we found that the Bulala, Xhosa, and Mada populations consistently exhibited pairwise above 1% when compared with any other population, whereas the non-Bantu Niger-Kordofanian populations of the Igbo, Brong, and Yoruba exhibited little genetic differentiation from one another (average <0.4%). These results suggest that there are clear and discernible genetic differences among some of the West African populations, whereas others appear to be nearly indistinguishable even when comparing over 300,000 genetic markers. Table 1. FST distances between African populations To investigate whether we could reliably distinguish ancestry among individuals from these populations, we used two approaches tailored for high-density genotype data. One, FRAPPE, implements a maximum likelihood method to infer genetic ancestry of each individual, wherein the individuals are assumed to have originated from ancestral clusters (26). Fig. 1and Fig. S2 summarize FRAPPE results when the number of clusters, = 2 to = 7. The small number of clusters was consistent with the small overall level of population differentiation among these populations. We next undertook PCA 60643-86-9 of the matrix of individual genotype values (i.e., the matrix with entries 0, 1, or 2 generated by tallying the number 60643-86-9 of copies of a given allele across all SNPs in a panel for all those individuals genotyped) (30). Fig. 1. Population structure within West Africa and relation to language and geography. (= 2, with Bulala, Mada, and Kaba populations showing some genetic Itga1 similarity with the Fulani. PCA, likewise, separated the Fulani from other populations along the first principal component (PC1) (Fig. 1and = 3, the FRAPPE 60643-86-9 algorithm clusters the Bulala into their own group and suggests genetic similarity of the Mada, Kaba, and Hausa, potentially indicating differentiation 60643-86-9 of Nilo-Saharan- and Afro-Asiatic-speaking populations from Niger-Kordofanian-speaking populations. At = 4, all individuals from the Bantu-speaking Xhosa of South Africa cluster into a single group and individuals from the Bantu-speaking populations (Fang, Bamoun, and Kongo) exhibit considerable shared membership in this cluster. At = 5, the Mada are distinguishable as a unique group, with modest genetic similarity with the Hausa and Kaba as well as with most of the Niger-Kordofanian populations. These results suggest that although these populations are quite closely related genetically, it is possible to detect meaningful population substructure given sufficient marker density [see also ref. (2)]. It is important to note that there is likely further substructure and diversity within these populations. Because we sample a modest number of individuals from each population (= 13, on average, per population), we are not.