فاستدللنا إذا كانت الغلة لم يقع عليها صفقةُ البيع، فيكونَ لها حصة من الثمن، وكانت في ملك المشتري في الوقت الذي لو مات فيه العبد مات من مال المشتري أنه إنما جعلها له لأنها حادثة في ملكه وضمانه
We inferred—since that profit was not the subject of the original bargain such that a share of the price was allocated to it, and since it was part of the buyer’s property at the time when, if the slave had died, he would have died while belonging to the buyer—that he only granted this right to the buyer because such profit came into being as part of his property and as something for which he thus assumed liability