قَالَ أَبُو عُبَيْدٍ وَهَذَا التَّأْوِيلُ عِنْدِي لَا مَعْنَى لَهُ؛ لِأَنَّ الثَّمَرَةَ إِنْ كَانَتْ لَمْ تَخْرُجْ مِنْ مِلْكِ الْوَاهِبِ وَإِنَّمَا هِيَ مَالُهُ عَلَى حَالِهَا الْأُولَى فَأَيُّ بَيْعٍ يَقَعُ هَاهُنَا
Abu 'Ubayd said This interpretation, in my opinion, is devoid of meaning. Even though the fruit has not gone out of the ownership of the donor, and it continues to be his property as before, where is the sale that has taken place here