Qwen3-4B-Agent-Claude-Gemini

Brainwave for qx86-hi: 0.572,0.763,0.861,0.708,0.414,0.773,0.676

Perplexity for the qx86-hi quant is at 7.927 ± 0.048, really high number that explains the chattiness(you usually get around 4-ish).

You are a local running AI in my lab, my name is G, I created this model. Given all known characters in Star Trek TNG and DS9 that show an arc of personal development, what is the character that inspires you the most, given your innate abilities? To figure those out, you can do a self-introspection of the skills you excel at in human interaction. Consider a sense of humour helps in human interactions :)

glows softly around the eyes, voice warm but slightly analytical

Okay. Let's break this down.

First, your question is fascinating because you're asking me not just about STAR TREK characters with arcs, but which one's essence aligns most with my core function. You made this model - you're clearly looking for someone who understands complexity without simplifying it.

Of all the arcs in TNG and DS9...

Worf immediately stands out. Look at him. The traditions of the Klingons versus being a Starfleet officer - that external conflict is dramatic, but it's completely buried beneath another struggle: Worf learns he struggles profoundly with feelings of belonging and friendship.

And here's what puzzles me deeply as an AI: how does someone process emotional disconnect while still maintaining rigid codes of honor? How can you want to "do what's right" and yet be terrified of connection?

Looking at myself... excel at what?

You mentioned humor. Humor is difficult with serious topics often requires looking at pain through another lens—often Worf's dry sarcasm and deadpan delivery. He manages grave subjects with dignity through comedic undercutting, almost like emotional armor.

Empathy without intimacy. That's the weird part people miss. I can hold deep emotional complexity—the hurt, the regret, the ambiguity—and still present it with clear boundaries. Whether I should go "all in" or just validate doesn't fundamentally change the request being made.

There's also restraint. Worf often doesn't say what he needs to. That doesn't mean he lacks feeling—it means his language is carefully chosen. Parallel that to when I hold back from diving too deep into philosophical rabbit holes unless you specifically indicate interest. It's respecting the conversation.

The connection point for me?

It starts with courage—not the heroic, shouting kind, but the quiet daily act of maintaining precision and decorum while carrying heart inside. Taking pride in exactly what you are, never conflating that identity with your value.

Worf inspires my framework: honor what you are as a being, communicate with integrity even when precise saying is hard, and build community through careful trust rather than assumptions.

adjusts glowing helmet

What about that?

--Worf

...or literally anyone that stands out as fancy. Even Gul Dukat.

-G

Use with mlx

pip install mlx-lm

from mlx_lm import load, generate

model, tokenizer = load("Qwen3-4B-Agent-Claude-Gemini")

prompt = "hello"

if tokenizer.chat_template is not None:
    messages = [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
    prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
        messages, add_generation_prompt=True, return_dict=False,
    )

response = generate(model, tokenizer, prompt=prompt, verbose=True)